|
Result of the Questionnaire for JSPS Asian Science Seminar Participants |
|
(Quantity of responses:39)
1. Organization of the whole seminar |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
The time allotted to each part of the program was appropriate |
11% |
54% |
22% |
11% |
3% |
The lecture and advanced materials were effectively linked |
27% |
49% |
16% |
8% |
- |
The size of the classes was optimal |
28% |
42% |
14% |
17% |
- |
2. Lectures in the seminar program(Nov. 29-Dec. 1) |
Sufficient time was allocated for each lecture |
24% |
53% |
13% |
5% |
5% |
The lectures were useful in your research (interesting, stimulating and practical) |
39% |
45% |
8% |
5% |
3% |
The level of the lectures relative to your educational background and experience was optimal |
15% |
54% |
23% |
8% |
- |
Lecturers gave equal treatment to all the participants |
33% |
36% |
26% |
5% |
- |
Lecturers respected the ideas, opinions and comments of the participants |
44% |
44% |
5% |
8% |
- |
3. Lectures in the school program (Dec. 2-Dec. 3) |
Sufficient time was allocated for each lecture |
26% |
38% |
18% |
15% |
3% |
The lectures were useful in your research (interesting, stimulating and practical) |
34% |
46% |
14% |
3% |
3% |
The level of the lectures relative to your educational background and experience was optimal |
25% |
50% |
17% |
8% |
- |
Lecturers gave equal treatment to all the participants |
47% |
31% |
17% |
6% |
- |
Lecturers respected the ideas, opinions and comments of the participants |
46% |
40% |
9% |
6% |
- |
4. Visiting institutes (if applicable) |
The Institutes that participants visited provided opportunities for the participants to have useful experiences |
60% |
40% |
- |
- |
- |
Visiting Institutes were meaningful for your research |
80% |
20% |
- |
- |
- |
5. Poster Presentation |
Opportunity of your poster presentation was meaningful for your research |
50% |
23% |
15% |
4% |
8% |
Poster presentations by other participants were meaningful for your research |
32% |
35% |
26% |
6% |
- |
6. Overall |
Location of the seminar site was convenient |
33% |
31% |
10% |
18% |
8% |
Environment of the lecture hall was comfortable |
44% |
28% |
10% |
10% |
8% |
Your participation in the seminar was meaningful in your carrier |
46% |
41% |
5% |
5% |
3% |
You are able to create and expand working networks with other researchers or Ph.D students by participating in the seminar |
44% |
33% |
13% |
8% |
3% |
The letters stand for the following: A = strongly agree B = agree C = neutral D = disagree E = completely disagree
|
|
- Sessions were good because each session was very interesting. In school, speakers taught basic information step by step. It was nice for students.(male, Japanese, PhD student)
- We had created and expanded working network and friendship with foreign researchers and students.(male, Japanese, Researcher)
- I was able to create working networks with other researchers. I could get a lot of information on latest research.(Female, Japanese, PhD student)
- This seminar was a plausible and possible candidate to have a great community of nanoscience in Asia.(male, Japanese, Ph.D student)
- Young researchers specially Ph.D students achieved and shared many ideas among themselves, which would extend their research for future.(male, Japanese, Ph.D student)
- Nanotech is an important subject for the present a future as development of the science. This seminar held sound implication for the researchers.(male, Japanese, Ph.D student)
- I obtained new research knowledge from speakers in the research areas, especially from India and Japan. (female, Indian, PhD student)
- It helped to interact and collaborate with other researchers. It also helped to learn new techniques and explore new ideas.(male, Indian, visiting faculty fellow)
- Very good lectures by Prof. Sanyal, Ian Robinson and others. The overall arrangements were very nice, well planned.(male, Indian, researcher)
- Overall organization, transport and accommodation were very good. Some lectures were very helpful in research(male, Indian, PhD student)
- Arrangement of lectures and speakers were very good (male, Indian, PhD student)
- The lectures given by Prof. Rao, Prof, Robinson, Sook, Prof. Shimomura, Pandey were very usuful and stimulating (male, India, Researcher) It was a good opportunity to collaborate synchrotron radiation centers not only for south-east Asian region but also from U.S and U.K.(female, Taiwanese, Ph.D student)
- All invited speakers were very professional and all talks are good.(male, Taiwanese, Ph.D student)
- The Content was excellent in respect of the current research activity (male, Malaysian, PhD student)
- I improved the knowledge of cluster, nanomaterials and surface with new properties.(male, Vietnamese, Researcher)
|
|
|
|